EFI·Evidence Fusion Initiative

Universal search

Search the sources

Keyword and entity retrieval over indexed evidence, hypotheses, and claims. Nothing is answered from model memory on this page. For a scored percentage with the working shown, open Fact or Fiction.

Score this

Topic remit

Day of

Engineering

Facilitation

Intelligence & process

Foreknowledge

Independent cluster

Entities

Matching hypotheses

  • H008U.S. agencies possessed actionable pre-attack intelligence on these two operativesScore
  • H009Relevant intelligence was withheld from the 9/11 CommissionScore
  • H010Bayoumi's assistance was un-tasked hospitality (competing explanation)Score
  • H001AA11 struck WTC1Score
  • H002UA175 struck WTC2Score
  • H003Aircraft impact and subsequent fire initiated WTC1 collapseScore
  • H004Additional energetic mechanisms contributed to WTC1 collapseScore
  • H005WTC7 collapse resulted from fire-induced structural failureScore
  • H006Explosives contributed to WTC7 failureScore
  • H011NORAD/FAA response failure was more than accident (exercises, false timeline, or interference)Score
  • H012Unusual pre-attack put-option activity reflected advance knowledge of the attacksScore
  • H013UA93 was shot down rather than crashed solely by a passenger revoltScore
  • H014The Pentagon was not struck by AA77 (missile or other object)Score
  • H015Able Danger identified Atta's cell before 9/11 and was blocked from warning the FBIScore
  • H016Urban Moving Systems detainees had organisational advance knowledge of the attacksScore
  • H017Directed energy, not impact/fire/conventional explosives, destroyed the twin towersScore
  • H018WTC 7 was 'pulled' — a controlled demolition was ordered that afternoonScore
  • H019Published hijacker identities are substantially wrong (some named men were not aboard)Score
  • H020Specific pre-attack warnings (Odigo and similar) show that some non-plot actors knew the morning's targetingScore
  • H021The 9/11 Commission was structurally prevented from being a truth-seeking enquiryScore

Matching claims

  • verifiedCLM-001

    Omar al-Bayoumi provided housing and banking assistance to Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar in San Diego in February 2000.

  • disputedCLM-002

    The 1 February 2000 restaurant meeting was a chance encounter.

  • partially_supportedCLM-003

    Omar al-Bayoumi was a paid cooptee of Saudi GIP reporting via Ambassador Bandar.

  • contradictedCLM-004

    Bayoumi did not knowingly assist Islamist extremists.

  • contradictedCLM-005

    Fahad al-Thumairy provided no assistance to the two operatives.

  • partially_supportedCLM-006

    Thumairy tasked an associate to help two 'very significant people' on arrival.

  • verifiedCLM-007

    U.S. agencies had actionable information on Mihdhar's U.S. visa in January 2000 and failed to watchlist him until August 2001.

  • indeterminateCLM-008

    Bayoumi had advance knowledge that the 9/11 attacks would occur.

  • well_supportedCLM-009

    The FBI withheld Bayoumi-related intelligence from the 9/11 Commission.

  • disputedCLM-010

    Bayoumi's assistance was ordinary Muslim hospitality with no tasking.

  • verifiedCLM-011

    American Airlines Flight 11 struck World Trade Center 1 at 08:46:40 on 11 September 2001.

  • disputedCLM-013

    Aircraft impact and the ensuing fires initiated the collapses of WTC 1 and WTC 2 without additional energetic devices.

  • disputedCLM-014

    Unreacted thermitic material was present in WTC dust.

  • disputedCLM-015

    WTC 7 collapsed from ordinary office fires following debris impact, without explosives.

  • disputedCLM-016

    Explosives or other additional energetic mechanisms contributed to WTC 7's failure.

  • disputedCLM-017

    Larry Silverstein ordered WTC 7 pulled in the demolition-slang sense.

  • disputedCLM-018

    UA93 was shot down by U.S. military rather than crashed by a passenger counterattack.

  • contradictedCLM-019

    The Pentagon was not struck by AA77.

  • disputedCLM-020

    Able Danger identified Mohamed Atta's cell before 11 September and was blocked from notifying the FBI.

  • indeterminateCLM-021

    Unusual pre-attack put-option activity reflected trading by people with advance knowledge of the plot.

  • unverifiedCLM-022

    The five Urban Moving Systems detainees had advance knowledge of the attacks as an Israeli intelligence team.

  • unsupportedCLM-023

    The twin towers were destroyed by directed energy, not by impact, fire, or conventional explosives.

  • contradictedCLM-025

    Some of the named 19 hijackers were not aboard the aircraft / were still alive.

  • partially_supportedCLM-026

    NORAD/FAA war-games and false timelines indicate the air-defence failure was more than accident.

  • disputedCLM-030

    WTC 7's entire measurable north and west rooflines instantaneously transitioned to free fall, a behaviour NIST's Stage 1 description conceals.

  • disputedCLM-031

    The 9/11 Commission was not a truth-seeking body; the Report is a 'Zelikow Report' defined by systematic omissions.

  • disputedCLM-032

    NIST NCSTAR reports on the WTC are false as engineering explanations.

  • disputedCLM-033

    First-responder explosion-language about the Twin Towers is evidence of demolition charges.

  • unverifiedCLM-034

    Reported 9/11 aircraft manoeuvres were not flyable manually by the named hijacker-pilots (automation/remote guidance).

  • disputedCLM-035

    A small CIA Alec Station group intentionally withheld Mihdhar/Hazmi information from the FBI, and the purpose became to allow the attacks.

  • disputedCLM-036

    The Pentagon attack involved inside-the-building explosives before AA77's official impact.

  • verifiedCLM-037

    A large born-digital public archive of 11 September emails, stories, and images exists and was acquired by the Library of Congress in 2003.

  • well_supportedCLM-038

    Street-level witnesses in lower Manhattan saw/heard a second aircraft hit the South Tower.

  • well_supportedCLM-039

    CIA senior products in summer 2001 described Bin Ladin attacks as imminent, including a strike in the US, without time/place/target.

  • verifiedCLM-040

    NTSB produced flight-path studies and ATC transcripts for the four hijacked flights and initially refused a public docket.

  • partially_supportedCLM-041

    The U.S. pressed the Taliban to expel bin Laden more than 30 times, with only three approaches in the first Bush year.

  • well_supportedCLM-042

    About three-quarters of CIA materials cited by the 9/11 Commission, including all KSM interrogation reports, remained withheld as of the 2012 File posting.

Evidence supporting

66
EVD-303email

911DA email: 6 blocks from Ground Zero, second-plane sound

September 11 Digital Archive (RRCHNM / ASHP) · 2001-09-12

A public-archive email describes street-level ash, paper, a 08:53 Wall Street exit, and the sound of a second aircraft hitting the South Tower from 5–6 blocks away, plus a Pentagon-evacuation report from Washington.

Quality 3.63 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth3
Ind4
Contemp5
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain3
EVD-211witness statement

Graeme MacQueen — 156 eyewitnesses describing explosions at the Twin Towers (Toronto Report ch.8)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

MacQueen compiled 156 accounts, mostly FDNY oral histories, in which speakers used explosion/bomb language about the towers; he documents both the original wording and some later retractions.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-230academic paper

Paul Zarembka — Insider trading before 9/11 re-examined (Toronto Report ch.6)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

A 2012 hearing paper surveys three academic option-market studies and argues the combined pre-attack activity is not plausibly random, while treating UAL/AMR themselves as weak because of hedging.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-209academic paper

David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report (Toronto Report ch.2)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Griffin's 2012 chapter lists Commission process constraints (Zelikow, funding, access) and twelve claimed omissions, with footnotes to named books, newspapers, and the Report itself.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-234academic paper

Barbara Honegger — Evidence of explosives at the Pentagon (Toronto Report ch.13)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Honegger compiles Pentagon witnesses who used bomb/cordite language, cites stopped clocks around 9:31–9:32, and treats the FBI code name PENTTBOM as evidence of a bombing investigation.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-228witness statement

Lorie Van Auken and Bob McIlvaine — Toronto Report ch.1 family testimony

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Two 9/11 family members testified in 2011 about their dead, the Jersey Girls' campaign for a full investigation, three NORAD public timelines, and Van Auken's contemporaneous unease at the Florida classroom footage.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3

Evidence contradicting

16
EVD-145academic paper

Bažant pancake model vs NIST initiation sequence

Bažant et al. — pancake / progressive-collapse papers on the WTC towers · 2002-01-01

Published official-adjacent models disagree on pancake vs bowing-column initiation of the tower collapses.

Quality 2.75 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-219academic paper

Jonathan Cole — Discussion of Le & Bažant spontaneous-collapse paper (Jul 2023)

Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2023-07-01

An ASCE member published a 2023 discussion challenging Le & Bažant's spontaneous-collapse treatment of the towers.

Quality 2.88 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-122engineering report

NIST / critics: red/gray chips consistent with primer paint, not thermite

NIST WTC investigation FAQs (towers and WTC 7) · 2019-11-20

NIST and subsequent paint-chemistry arguments attribute the red chips to known coatings rather than explosives.

Quality 3.50 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr3
Spec3
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-125media report

Silverstein Properties later: 'pull it' meant withdraw firefighters

PBS — America Rebuilds: A Day with Larry Silverstein (2002) · 2005-01-01

Silverstein's office published a firefighter-withdrawal reading of 'pull it.'

Quality 2.13 / 5components retained
Prov2
Auth3
Ind3
Contemp0
Corr2
Spec3
Comp2
Chain2
EVD-222academic paper

John D. Wyndham — Problems with theories alternative to large-plane impact at the Pentagon (Nov 2011)

Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2011-11-01

The Journal of 9/11 Studies published a 2011 paper arguing that theories alternative to a large-plane Pentagon impact have problems.

Quality 2.88 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-004government report

Commission: Bayoumi did not give them money beyond the reimbursed check

9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22

Commission found no continuing financial transfers from Bayoumi to the two men.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr4
Spec4
Comp4
Chain4

Ambiguous

81
EVD-402scientific paper

Eagar & Musso 2001: WTC fires did not melt steel; floor-truss connections were the weak point

Thomas W. Eagar & Christopher Musso — Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation (JOM, Dec 2001) · 2001-12-01

In December 2001 MIT materials engineers published that WTC fires were not hot enough to melt steel and that weakened floor-truss connections were the likely weak point.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind4
Contemp4
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain3
EVD-307witness statement

911DA story: last Windows/observation-deck visit the night of 10 September

September 11 Digital Archive (RRCHNM / ASHP) · 2002-10-22

A October 2002 Digital Archive story claims a visitor party was on the WTC observation deck around 22:00 on 10 September 2001 and was offered rain checks dated 11 September.

Quality 2.50 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth2
Ind4
Contemp2
Corr2
Spec3
Comp2
Chain2
EVD-208academic paper

Chandler, Walter, Szamboti — Instantaneous free fall of WTC 7 and NIST's attempt to hide it (Jun 2023)

Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2023-06-01

Using multi-point tracking, Chandler/Walter/Szamboti report that after ~1.4 s of near-immobility of most of the north and west rooflines, those rooflines entered free fall together within ~0.2 s at ~8.0–8.2 s after east-penthouse collapse, ~9.8 m/s² for ~2.5 s.

Quality 2.88 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-123academic paper

Hulsey et al. (UAF): fire did not cause the observed collapse of WTC 7

Hulsey, Quan, Xiao — University of Alaska Fairbanks WTC 7 study (2019–2020) · 2020-03-01

A University of Alaska Fairbanks team published a model concluding fire did not cause WTC 7's observed collapse.

Quality 2.63 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind2
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-105engineering report

NIST NCSTAR 1: impact plus fire initiated collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2

NIST NCSTAR 1 — Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (2005) · 2005-09-01

NIST published a fire-and-impact initiation sequence for WTC 1 and WTC 2 in 2005.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-109engineering report

NIST: no corroborating evidence for explosives or thermite

NIST WTC investigation FAQs (towers and WTC 7) · 2019-11-20

NIST published a negative finding on explosives and thermite as collapse causes.

Quality 3.63 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind1
Contemp2
Corr3
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4

Contemporary reports

76
EVD-145academic paper

Bažant pancake model vs NIST initiation sequence

Bažant et al. — pancake / progressive-collapse papers on the WTC towers · 2002-01-01

Published official-adjacent models disagree on pancake vs bowing-column initiation of the tower collapses.

Quality 2.75 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-303email

911DA email: 6 blocks from Ground Zero, second-plane sound

September 11 Digital Archive (RRCHNM / ASHP) · 2001-09-12

A public-archive email describes street-level ash, paper, a 08:53 Wall Street exit, and the sound of a second aircraft hitting the South Tower from 5–6 blocks away, plus a Pentagon-evacuation report from Washington.

Quality 3.63 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth3
Ind4
Contemp5
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain3
EVD-402scientific paper

Eagar & Musso 2001: WTC fires did not melt steel; floor-truss connections were the weak point

Thomas W. Eagar & Christopher Musso — Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation (JOM, Dec 2001) · 2001-12-01

In December 2001 MIT materials engineers published that WTC fires were not hot enough to melt steel and that weakened floor-truss connections were the likely weak point.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind4
Contemp4
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain3
EVD-307witness statement

911DA story: last Windows/observation-deck visit the night of 10 September

September 11 Digital Archive (RRCHNM / ASHP) · 2002-10-22

A October 2002 Digital Archive story claims a visitor party was on the WTC observation deck around 22:00 on 10 September 2001 and was offered rain checks dated 11 September.

Quality 2.50 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth2
Ind4
Contemp2
Corr2
Spec3
Comp2
Chain2
EVD-311audio

Sonic Memorial: Eva Garfield Greenwich Village voicemails, 11 September

September 11 Digital Archive (RRCHNM / ASHP) · 2001-09-11

The Sonic Memorial collection includes saved 11 September voicemails in which Eva Garfield, from Greenwich Street, says she watched the towers fall, plus other WTC-building memory recordings.

Quality 3.50 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp5
Corr2
Spec4
Comp2
Chain3
EVD-127witness statement

Barry Jennings and Michael Hess: explosions and being trapped in WTC 7

BBC World — Jane Standley live report of WTC 7 collapse (11 September 2001) · 2001-09-11

Jennings and Hess were trapped in WTC 7 and described explosion-like events and delayed rescue.

Quality 3.50 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp4
Corr3
Spec2
Comp3
Chain4

Later recollections / analysis

87
EVD-211witness statement

Graeme MacQueen — 156 eyewitnesses describing explosions at the Twin Towers (Toronto Report ch.8)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

MacQueen compiled 156 accounts, mostly FDNY oral histories, in which speakers used explosion/bomb language about the towers; he documents both the original wording and some later retractions.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-230academic paper

Paul Zarembka — Insider trading before 9/11 re-examined (Toronto Report ch.6)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

A 2012 hearing paper surveys three academic option-market studies and argues the combined pre-attack activity is not plausibly random, while treating UAL/AMR themselves as weak because of hedging.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-209academic paper

David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report (Toronto Report ch.2)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Griffin's 2012 chapter lists Commission process constraints (Zelikow, funding, access) and twelve claimed omissions, with footnotes to named books, newspapers, and the Report itself.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-234academic paper

Barbara Honegger — Evidence of explosives at the Pentagon (Toronto Report ch.13)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Honegger compiles Pentagon witnesses who used bomb/cordite language, cites stopped clocks around 9:31–9:32, and treats the FBI code name PENTTBOM as evidence of a bombing investigation.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-208academic paper

Chandler, Walter, Szamboti — Instantaneous free fall of WTC 7 and NIST's attempt to hide it (Jun 2023)

Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2023-06-01

Using multi-point tracking, Chandler/Walter/Szamboti report that after ~1.4 s of near-immobility of most of the north and west rooflines, those rooflines entered free fall together within ~0.2 s at ~8.0–8.2 s after east-penthouse collapse, ~9.8 m/s² for ~2.5 s.

Quality 2.88 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-123academic paper

Hulsey et al. (UAF): fire did not cause the observed collapse of WTC 7

Hulsey, Quan, Xiao — University of Alaska Fairbanks WTC 7 study (2019–2020) · 2020-03-01

A University of Alaska Fairbanks team published a model concluding fire did not cause WTC 7's observed collapse.

Quality 2.63 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind2
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2

Official documents

80
EVD-105engineering report

NIST NCSTAR 1: impact plus fire initiated collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2

NIST NCSTAR 1 — Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (2005) · 2005-09-01

NIST published a fire-and-impact initiation sequence for WTC 1 and WTC 2 in 2005.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-108engineering report

NIST: tower collapse times ~11 s (WTC1) and ~9 s (WTC2); minimal resistance below

NIST WTC investigation FAQs (towers and WTC 7) · 2011-09-14

NIST published collapse elapsed times near free-fall order and described minimal resistance below the initiation zone.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-107engineering report

NIST FAQ: WTC 7 north face had a 2.25-second free-fall stage

NIST WTC investigation FAQs (towers and WTC 7) · 2019-11-20

NIST measured a 2.25-second free-fall stage of WTC 7's north face and described negligible support from the structure below.

Quality 3.75 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp1
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-109engineering report

NIST: no corroborating evidence for explosives or thermite

NIST WTC investigation FAQs (towers and WTC 7) · 2019-11-20

NIST published a negative finding on explosives and thermite as collapse causes.

Quality 3.63 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind1
Contemp2
Corr3
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-122engineering report

NIST / critics: red/gray chips consistent with primer paint, not thermite

NIST WTC investigation FAQs (towers and WTC 7) · 2019-11-20

NIST and subsequent paint-chemistry arguments attribute the red chips to known coatings rather than explosives.

Quality 3.50 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr3
Spec3
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-002government report

1 February 2000 restaurant encounter — chance or design unknown

9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22

A lunch on 1 February 2000 involving Bayoumi, Hazmi, and Mihdhar is documented because Bayoumi reported it.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr4
Spec4
Comp4
Chain4

Independent / media

56
EVD-211witness statement

Graeme MacQueen — 156 eyewitnesses describing explosions at the Twin Towers (Toronto Report ch.8)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

MacQueen compiled 156 accounts, mostly FDNY oral histories, in which speakers used explosion/bomb language about the towers; he documents both the original wording and some later retractions.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-230academic paper

Paul Zarembka — Insider trading before 9/11 re-examined (Toronto Report ch.6)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

A 2012 hearing paper surveys three academic option-market studies and argues the combined pre-attack activity is not plausibly random, while treating UAL/AMR themselves as weak because of hedging.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-209academic paper

David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report (Toronto Report ch.2)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Griffin's 2012 chapter lists Commission process constraints (Zelikow, funding, access) and twelve claimed omissions, with footnotes to named books, newspapers, and the Report itself.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-234academic paper

Barbara Honegger — Evidence of explosives at the Pentagon (Toronto Report ch.13)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Honegger compiles Pentagon witnesses who used bomb/cordite language, cites stopped clocks around 9:31–9:32, and treats the FBI code name PENTTBOM as evidence of a bombing investigation.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-208academic paper

Chandler, Walter, Szamboti — Instantaneous free fall of WTC 7 and NIST's attempt to hide it (Jun 2023)

Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2023-06-01

Using multi-point tracking, Chandler/Walter/Szamboti report that after ~1.4 s of near-immobility of most of the north and west rooflines, those rooflines entered free fall together within ~0.2 s at ~8.0–8.2 s after east-penthouse collapse, ~9.8 m/s² for ~2.5 s.

Quality 2.88 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-219academic paper

Jonathan Cole — Discussion of Le & Bažant spontaneous-collapse paper (Jul 2023)

Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2023-07-01

An ASCE member published a 2023 discussion challenging Le & Bažant's spontaneous-collapse treatment of the towers.

Quality 2.88 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2

Unresolved contradictions

  • CTR-001Bayoumi's intelligence role: Commission 2004 vs FBI 2017
  • CTR-002Thumairy assistance: Commission vs FBI 2021
  • CTR-0031 February mosque visit: Bayoumi vs Bin Don
  • CTR-004Bayoumi first interview vs later account
  • CTR-005Chance meeting vs planned meeting
  • CTR-006FBI access representation vs later material
  • CTR-007WTC7 mechanism: NIST fire vs Hulsey not-fire
  • CTR-008WTC dust chips: thermite vs primer paint
  • CTR-009Silverstein 'pull it': demolition vs firefighter withdrawal
  • CTR-010Able Danger Atta identification
  • CTR-011Put options: unusual volume vs no plot-participant profits
  • CTR-012Hijacker identities: BBC still-alive vs Commission mistaken-identity
  • CTR-013Pentagon: AA77 vs no-Boeing
  • CTR-015WTC7 free fall: NIST consistency vs demolition signature
  • CTR-017WTC 7 Stage 1: NIST gradual vs Chandler instantaneous whole-roofline free fall
  • CTR-018Commission completeness vs Griffin omissions list
  • CTR-019IC911 journal vs IC911 journal on the Pentagon object
  • CTR-020CIA withholding: incompetence vs allowed-to-proceed
  • CTR-021CIA IG August 2001 praise vs 2004 CIA OIG / Commission on CTC
  • CTR-022NTSB public-docket refusal vs NSArchive FOIA release of the same path/ATC files

Developed by British researcher Moneypenny

@nic_moneypenny · Subscribe on X from $2 a month for other investigations, and to support this work.

Built with Grok by xAI. EFI / 911 is an independent research project. Neither Moneypenny nor xAI, X, or Grok accepts any liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Scores are not court or government findings. Privacy and terms.