EFI/911

EFI·Evidence Fusion Initiative

PER-ZAREMBKA

Paul Zarembka

economistToronto ch.6 author

Re-examines pre-9/11 option-market studies (Poteshman, Wong, Chesney). Argues combined probabilities are not random.

Econometric claim. Does not identify traders as plot participants.

Witness statements (unmerged)

Later recollections are not folded into contemporaneous reports.

    No statements stored.

Graph edges

    Contradictions

      None indexed for this person.

    Linked evidence

    EVD-230academic paper

    Paul Zarembka — Insider trading before 9/11 re-examined (Toronto Report ch.6)

    The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

    A 2012 hearing paper surveys three academic option-market studies and argues the combined pre-attack activity is not plausibly random, while treating UAL/AMR themselves as weak because of hedging.

    Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
    Prov4
    Auth4
    Ind3
    Contemp1
    Corr2
    Spec4
    Comp4
    Chain3

    Developed by British researcher Moneypenny

    @nic_moneypenny · Subscribe on X from $2 a month for other investigations, and to support this work.

    Built with Grok by xAI. EFI / 911 is an independent research project. Neither Moneypenny nor xAI, X, or Grok accepts any liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Scores are not court or government findings. Privacy and terms.