PER-RYAN-K
Kevin R. Ryan
Kevin Ryan
Dismissed from UL after criticising NIST. Toronto ch.3 argues NIST WTC reports are false. Author of Another Nineteen (2013).
Independence from NIST is high; independence from the demolition research cluster is not.
Witness statements (unmerged)
Later recollections are not folded into contemporaneous reports.
No statements stored.
Graph edges
Contradictions
None indexed for this person.
Linked evidence
Kevin R. Ryan — Why the NIST World Trade Center Reports are False (Toronto Report ch.3)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Ryan cites NIST test and model figures (steel temperatures, sag, expansion, fire duration) and states they do not support the published collapse sequences; he notes NIST did not release its global models for independent runs.
IC911 presentations catalogue (2023–2026)
International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2026-09-02
IC911 lists seven presentations 2023–2026 on flight simulation, seismic claims, hijacking, air defence, the North Tower spire, and WTC 7 free fall.
Kevin Ryan — Lies and Obstruction: Indefensible Air Defenses on 9/11 (8 Sep 2024)
International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2024-09-08
Ryan presented a 2024 talk arguing 9/11 air defences were 'indefensible' in a stronger sense than fog-of-war.
Robinson & Ryan — 9/11 and COVID-19 as structural deep events (Sep 2024)
Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2024-09-01
In 2024 IC911's journal published a paper treating 9/11 and COVID-19 as comparable structural deep events.
Kevin R. Ryan — Extreme temperatures at the WTC (Toronto Report ch.10)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Ryan compiles NIST temperature figures, molten-metal witness language, RJ Lee iron-sphere percentages, USGS molybdenum spheres, and FEMA Appendix C sulfidation, and treats them as requiring a heat source above office-fire steel-melting.