EVD-108
NIST: tower collapse times ~11 s (WTC1) and ~9 s (WTC2); minimal resistance below
engineering reportofficial governmentauthenticoriginal
Provenance
- Source
- NIST WTC investigation FAQs (towers and WTC 7)
- Date
- 2011-09-14
- Page
- NIST towers FAQ item 31; NCSTAR 1 §6.14.4
- SHA-256
- cbae5e20ccfdbc55a0687c4cc1dafea5a86e04bde0cf057dc2007b762c54fefc
- Classification
- unclassified
- Copyright
- public domain
https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-center-investigation/study-faqs/wtc-towers-investigation
Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
Observation
NIST published collapse elapsed times near free-fall order and described minimal resistance below the initiation zone.
Interpretation
Supports H003's progression-after-initiation story and is also the main official sentence that H004 cites. Ambiguous between the two until more specific column-failure evidence is weighed.
Source text
OBSERVATION: NIST FAQ and NCSTAR 1 §6.14.4 give ~11 s and ~9 s and state that the structure below offered minimal resistance. A vacuum free-fall from ~415 m is ~9.2 s. Alternative investigators argue that a building cannot fall through itself that fast without column destruction ahead of the rubble. NIST argues that once initiated, the falling mass so exceeded remaining capacity that resistance was negligible.
Hypothesis linkage
NIST timing and 'minimal resistance' as progression after initiation.
Minimal-resistance / near-free-fall times are the official sentences demolition arguments cite.
People
Citations
- No citation edges.