EFI/911

EFI·Evidence Fusion Initiative

EVD-222

John D. Wyndham — Problems with theories alternative to large-plane impact at the Pentagon (Nov 2011)

academic paperindependent researcherauthenticoriginal

Provenance

Source
Journal of 9/11 Studies
Date
2011-11-01
Page
—
SHA-256
761afeb14fbdd2ff741a43ea8cb012c0ec725845ba0aa29e6d73ae0df2483b9a
Classification
unclassified
Copyright
unknown

https://ic911.org/journal/articles/

Quality 2.88 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2

Observation

The Journal of 9/11 Studies published a 2011 paper arguing that theories alternative to a large-plane Pentagon impact have problems.

Interpretation

This item weakly_contradicts H014 from inside the alternative literature. Official NTSB/ASCE remain the high-quality contradicts.

Source text

Catalogued from journal index. Important for cluster honesty: IC911's journal published a paper finding problems with alternatives to a large-plane Pentagon impact. That is a contradict of H014 inside the IC911 family.

Hypothesis linkage

  • H014contradictsseeded

    In-cluster journal paper against alternatives to large-plane impact.

People

    Citations

    Developed by British researcher Moneypenny

    @nic_moneypenny · Subscribe on X from $2 a month for other investigations, and to support this work.

    Built with Grok by xAI. EFI / 911 is an independent research project. Neither Moneypenny nor xAI, X, or Grok accepts any liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Scores are not court or government findings. Privacy and terms.