EFI·Evidence Fusion Initiative·The 11 September 2001 open case file
Conflict engine
Official conclusions that later moved, witness splits, and access representations. Query example: Omar al-Bayoumi.
2008-11-20 · NIST NCSTAR 1A
WTC 7 collapsed from fire-induced buckling of Column 79 after debris from WTC 1 started fires.
EVD-1062020-03-01 · Hulsey et al., UAF
Fire did not cause the observed collapse; near-simultaneous column failure is required.
EVD-123Direct engineering contradiction. Funding of Hulsey by AE911Truth is a quality factor, not a reason to hide the paper.
2004-07-22 · Commission / NTSB / ASCE
AA77, a Boeing 757, struck the Pentagon at 09:37:46 along an NTSB path with ASCE-mapped interior damage.
EVD-1162009-01-01 · CIT and related
Selected witnesses and façade photographs mean a 757 did not hit the building.
EVD-148Quality-weighted, A currently dominates. B stays because the user instruction is not to hide labelled claims.
2004-07-22 · 9/11 Commission Report, Ch. 7
No credible evidence Bayoumi knowingly aided extremists; unlikely clandestine candidate.
EVD-0052017-06-14 · FBI report 14 June 2017 (EO 14040)
Allegations of Bayoumi's Saudi intelligence involvement were not confirmed at Commission time; the 2017 information confirms them. He was a paid GIP cooptee.
EVD-010Hard contradiction on intelligence-officer status. Does not automatically resolve plot knowledge.
2008-11-20 · NIST NCSTAR 1A / FAQ
NIST Stage 1: acceleration less than g as buckling progressed, measured at one north-face centre point, then Stage 2 free fall.
EVD-1072023-06-01 · Journal of 9/11 Studies, June 2023
Chandler/Walter/Szamboti 2023: most of the north and west rooflines stayed still ~1.4 s, then the entire measurable roofline entered free fall together within ~0.2 s — a transition they say NIST's Stage 1 hides.
EVD-208Same building, same free-fall stage, different description of the onset and of how much of the roofline moved. Measurement dispute, then interpretation.
2003-05-01 · NORAD public timeline
Early NORAD public and May 2003 testimony described a more capable, earlier-notified defence.
EVD-1042006-08-01 · Vanity Fair tapes / Farmer
NEADS tapes and Commission counsel show a phantom AA11, late notice, and that some accounts were not true.
EVD-135Hard process contradiction. Cause (fog, CYA, exercises, or design) is H011 and remains open.
2004-07-22 · 9/11 Commission Report, Ch. 7
We have not found evidence that Thumairy provided assistance to the two operatives.
EVD-0062021-09-11 · FBI EO 14040 16-page report
Thumairy tasked an associate to help two 'very significant people' on arrival in Los Angeles.
EVD-012Negative finding vs positive tasking allegation. Different evidence bases, 17 years apart.
2009-04-03 · Harrit et al. 2009
Red/gray chips are unreacted thermitic material; DSC exotherms ~430°C; iron-rich spheres after ignition.
EVD-1212019-11-20 · NIST FAQ / paint-chemistry critics
Chips are consistent with primer paint / known coatings; NIST found no corroborating thermite evidence.
EVD-122Measurement vs counter-identification. Neither side has an uncontested public replication on a fully documented sample set.
2011-11-01 · Journal of 9/11 Studies
Wyndham 2011 and Legge & Stutt 2011, in the Journal of 9/11 Studies, support a large-plane / official AA77 path.
EVD-222The alternative literature is internally split. Do not treat 'IC911' as a single Pentagon claim.
2005-09-21 · Shaffer / Weldon hearings
Able Danger identified Atta and a Brooklyn cell before 9/11; lawyers blocked FBI notification.
EVD-1302005-08-12 · 9/11 Commission staff
Commission staff found the identification unsubstantiated and noted it was not raised in contemporaneous interviews.
EVD-131Witness set vs institutional negative. Programme existence is not the dispute; the Atta photo/chart is.
2004-07-22 · 9/11 Commission / CIA OIG
Official reviews treat the Mihdhar/Hazmi watchlisting failure as systemic/process failure.
EVD-0152012-09-11 · Toronto Report ch.5
Fenton/Scott: a small Alec Station group withheld the information intentionally, and after summer 2001 the purpose was to allow the attacks.
EVD-229The withholding is documented. Intent and purpose are the dispute. Do not collapse them.
2002-09-10 · PBS America Rebuilds
He said pull it and they made that decision to pull and watched the building collapse — demolition slang.
EVD-1242005-01-01 · Silverstein Properties clarification
Pull meant withdraw firefighters; the collapse was not an ordered demolition.
EVD-125Authentic utterance; competing lexicons. Do not treat either reading as a confession or a nothing.
2019-11-20 · NIST WTC7 FAQ
A 2.25-second free-fall stage is consistent with NIST's exterior-column buckling model.
EVD-1072008-11-20 · AE911Truth / independent physics arguments
Free fall through a steel high-rise indicates simultaneous support removal, i.e. explosives.
EVD-150Same official measurement, opposite inferences. Measurement is not the dispute; implication is.
2004-07-22 · 9/11 Commission Report preface
The Commission Report presents itself as a full account of the facts and circumstances of 9/11.
EVD-1202012-09-11 · Toronto Report ch.2
Griffin: WTC 7, Mineta/Cheney, NORAD first story, PNAC, and other items were omitted in ways unexpected of a truth-seeking body.
EVD-209Several listed omissions are independently documented in this lab. Whether they sum to 'not truth-seeking' is H021.
2001-09-01 · Commission paraphrase of FBI interviews
Initial denial of knowing Hazmi and Mihdhar.
EVD-022Documents corroborate the later account. The denial is therefore false, whatever the motive.
2004-07-22 · 9/11 Commission
Those reports were cases of similar names or stolen identities; the 19 were aboard.
EVD-140Week-one list quality was poor. A global fake-19 claim is much weaker than the existence of early identity errors.
2001-08-01 · CIA IG (via NSAEBB 381)
August 2001 CIA Inspector General review: CTC information-management and FBI cooperation in good order, improved since 1994.
EVD-3332004-07-22 · CIA OIG 2004 / 9/11 Commission
2004 CIA OIG and the 9/11 Commission: pre-attack counterterrorism practice, warning, and FBI-CIA fusion were deficient.
EVD-016Same agency, two IG-era products. Pre-attack self-assessment vs post-attack review. Do not collapse into a single 'CIA knew' finding.
2000-02-01 · Bayoumi interviews via Commission
Bayoumi: they could not find King Fahd Mosque that day.
EVD-021Same-day witness split. Material to whether Thumairy contact was possible that afternoon.
2004-07-22 · 9/11 Commission / NTSB CVR
CVR and phone calls show a passenger counterattack; the aircraft crashed in a field at 10:03:11.
EVD-1032001-09-13 · witness/debris arguments
Nearby military aircraft and a scattered debris field indicate a shoot-down.
EVD-141Official transcription currently outweighs. Residual physical questions remain because the transcription is itself an institutional product.
2024-08-09 · ProPublica / NYT citing discovery
2024 reporting and civil evidence: timing of the LA trip was misstated; meeting looks planned.
EVD-024B is still secondary until discovery documents are ingested as evidence objects.
2006-07-01 · Poteshman, Journal of Business
Option market activity in airline names before 9/11 was statistically unusual, consistent with informed trading.
EVD-1322004-07-22 · 9/11 Commission / SEC
Investigation found no evidence that anyone with advance knowledge of the attacks profited through securities.
EVD-118Not a hard logical contradiction: unusual volume can exist without identified al-Qaeda (or official) traders. Still a live tension for H012.
2017-06-14 · FBI 2017 report
FBI 2017: intel-role allegations were not confirmed for the Commission and are now confirmed.
EVD-010May be withholding, or genuine later development of analysis. H009 remains open.
2002-02-19 · NTSB website statement (quoted in NSAEBB 196)
NTSB: the 9/11 attacks are under FBI jurisdiction; NTSB will not issue a report or open a public docket.
EVD-3232006-08-11 · National Security Archive NSAEBB 196
August 2006: NTSB released the path studies and ATC transcripts in full to the National Security Archive under FOIA.
EVD-323Not a fact contradiction about the flights. A process contradiction about who may publish the technical record.