Universal search
Search the sources
Keyword and entity retrieval over indexed evidence, hypotheses, and claims. Nothing is answered from model memory on this page. For a scored percentage with the working shown, open Fact or Fiction.
Topic remit
Day of
Engineering
Facilitation
Intelligence & process
Foreknowledge
Independent cluster
Entities
- Omar al-Bayoumi
- Nawaf al-Hazmi
- Khalid al-Mihdhar
- Fahad al-Thumairy
- Anwar al-Awlaki
- Caysan Bin Don
- Prince Bandar bin Sultan
- Abdussattar Shaikh
- Khalid Sheikh Mohammed
- Osama Bassnan
- Hani Hanjour
- Holly Ratchford
- Thomas Kean
- Mohamed Atta
- Ziad Jarrah
- Larry Silverstein
- Norman Mineta
- Dick Cheney
- Anthony Shaffer
- Kenneth Williams
- Coleen Rowley
- Zacarias Moussaoui
- Steven E. Jones
- Niels H. Harrit
- J. Leroy Hulsey
- Judy Wood
- Barry Jennings
- Michael Hess
- William Rodriguez
- Jane Standley
- Sivaraj Shyam-Sunder
- John Farmer
- George W. Bush
- David Ray Griffin
- Ted Walter
- Graeme MacQueen
- Kevin R. Ryan
- Piers Robinson
- Natalie Schilling
- Jonathan H. Cole
- Philip Zelikow
- James Gourley
- Søren Roest Korsgaard
- Bob McIlvaine
- Peter Dale Scott
- Paul Zarembka
- Barbara Honegger
- Kristina Claunch
- Mary Marshall Clark
- Peter Bearman
- Barbara Elias-Sanborn
- Richard A. Clarke
- Michael F. Scheuer
- Sajit Gandhi
- Michael Horrocks
- Thomas W. Eagar
- Christopher Musso
Matching hypotheses
- H008U.S. agencies possessed actionable pre-attack intelligence on these two operativesScore
- H009Relevant intelligence was withheld from the 9/11 CommissionScore
- H011NORAD/FAA response failure was more than accident (exercises, false timeline, or interference)Score
- H012Unusual pre-attack put-option activity reflected advance knowledge of the attacksScore
- H013UA93 was shot down rather than crashed solely by a passenger revoltScore
- H014The Pentagon was not struck by AA77 (missile or other object)Score
- H015Able Danger identified Atta's cell before 9/11 and was blocked from warning the FBIScore
- H016Urban Moving Systems detainees had organisational advance knowledge of the attacksScore
- H017Directed energy, not impact/fire/conventional explosives, destroyed the twin towersScore
- H020Specific pre-attack warnings (Odigo and similar) show that some non-plot actors knew the morning's targetingScore
- H021The 9/11 Commission was structurally prevented from being a truth-seeking enquiryScore
Matching claims
- disputedCLM-002
The 1 February 2000 restaurant meeting was a chance encounter.
- contradictedCLM-005
Fahad al-Thumairy provided no assistance to the two operatives.
- verifiedCLM-007
U.S. agencies had actionable information on Mihdhar's U.S. visa in January 2000 and failed to watchlist him until August 2001.
- indeterminateCLM-008
Bayoumi had advance knowledge that the 9/11 attacks would occur.
- well_supportedCLM-009
The FBI withheld Bayoumi-related intelligence from the 9/11 Commission.
- disputedCLM-013
Aircraft impact and the ensuing fires initiated the collapses of WTC 1 and WTC 2 without additional energetic devices.
- disputedCLM-014
Unreacted thermitic material was present in WTC dust.
- disputedCLM-016
Explosives or other additional energetic mechanisms contributed to WTC 7's failure.
- disputedCLM-017
Larry Silverstein ordered WTC 7 pulled in the demolition-slang sense.
- disputedCLM-018
UA93 was shot down by U.S. military rather than crashed by a passenger counterattack.
- contradictedCLM-019
The Pentagon was not struck by AA77.
- disputedCLM-020
Able Danger identified Mohamed Atta's cell before 11 September and was blocked from notifying the FBI.
- indeterminateCLM-021
Unusual pre-attack put-option activity reflected trading by people with advance knowledge of the plot.
- unverifiedCLM-022
The five Urban Moving Systems detainees had advance knowledge of the attacks as an Israeli intelligence team.
- unsupportedCLM-023
The twin towers were destroyed by directed energy, not by impact, fire, or conventional explosives.
- contradictedCLM-025
Some of the named 19 hijackers were not aboard the aircraft / were still alive.
- partially_supportedCLM-026
NORAD/FAA war-games and false timelines indicate the air-defence failure was more than accident.
- disputedCLM-031
The 9/11 Commission was not a truth-seeking body; the Report is a 'Zelikow Report' defined by systematic omissions.
- disputedCLM-032
NIST NCSTAR reports on the WTC are false as engineering explanations.
- disputedCLM-033
First-responder explosion-language about the Twin Towers is evidence of demolition charges.
- unverifiedCLM-034
Reported 9/11 aircraft manoeuvres were not flyable manually by the named hijacker-pilots (automation/remote guidance).
- disputedCLM-035
A small CIA Alec Station group intentionally withheld Mihdhar/Hazmi information from the FBI, and the purpose became to allow the attacks.
- disputedCLM-036
The Pentagon attack involved inside-the-building explosives before AA77's official impact.
- verifiedCLM-037
A large born-digital public archive of 11 September emails, stories, and images exists and was acquired by the Library of Congress in 2003.
- well_supportedCLM-038
Street-level witnesses in lower Manhattan saw/heard a second aircraft hit the South Tower.
- well_supportedCLM-039
CIA senior products in summer 2001 described Bin Ladin attacks as imminent, including a strike in the US, without time/place/target.
- verifiedCLM-040
NTSB produced flight-path studies and ATC transcripts for the four hijacked flights and initially refused a public docket.
- partially_supportedCLM-041
The U.S. pressed the Taliban to expel bin Laden more than 30 times, with only three approaches in the first Bush year.
- well_supportedCLM-042
About three-quarters of CIA materials cited by the 9/11 Commission, including all KSM interrogation reports, remained withheld as of the 2012 File posting.
Evidence supporting
66NORAD exercises on 11 September including Vigilant Guardian
Michael Bronner, '9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,' Vanity Fair (August 2006) · 2006-08-01
NORAD was running exercises on 11 September that included hijack-related injects, and operators asked whether reports were exercise or real.
Vanity Fair 2006: NORAD tapes vs earlier public NORAD timeline
Michael Bronner, '9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,' Vanity Fair (August 2006) · 2006-08-01
Published tape reconstruction shows NORAD's early public timeline was inconsistent with its own audio.
Kevin Ryan — Lies and Obstruction: Indefensible Air Defenses on 9/11 (8 Sep 2024)
International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2024-09-08
Ryan presented a 2024 talk arguing 9/11 air defences were 'indefensible' in a stronger sense than fog-of-war.
Commission / NORAD tapes: delayed notification and a phantom AA11
9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22
Military notification lagged FAA awareness; a phantom AA11 was injected into the response.
David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in official accounts of AA77 and UA93 (Toronto Report ch.7)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Griffin's 2012 chapter lists named process contradictions on AA77 notification and UA93 notification, plus Pentagon-object and UA93-shoot-down arguments with named witnesses and an FAA memo.
John Farmer: NORAD and some FAA accounts of 11 September were not true
John Farmer / 9/11 Commission staff statements on NORAD and FAA accounts · 2004-07-22
Commission senior counsel stated that NORAD's (and some FAA) accounts were not true.
Evidence contradicting
16Commission: hijacker-still-alive reports were mistaken identity
9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22
The Commission treats early 'hijackers alive' stories as identification errors.
Legge & Stutt — AA77 FDR analysis supports official Pentagon flight path (Jan 2011)
Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2011-01-01
A 2011 Journal of 9/11 Studies FDR analysis concludes the official AA77 path to Pentagon impact is supported.
Commission staff: Able Danger Atta identification not substantiated
9/11 Commission Report · 2005-08-12
Commission staff published that they could not substantiate a pre-9/11 Able Danger identification of Atta.
John D. Wyndham — Problems with theories alternative to large-plane impact at the Pentagon (Nov 2011)
Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2011-11-01
The Journal of 9/11 Studies published a 2011 paper arguing that theories alternative to a large-plane Pentagon impact have problems.
NTSB flight-path study: AA77 from Dulles to the Pentagon
NTSB flight-path studies, Air Traffic Control tapes, and CVR/FDR summaries (AA11, UA175, AA77, UA93) · 2002-02-19
NTSB reconstructed a continuous radar/path track of AA77 from takeoff to the Pentagon.
Commission: Bayoumi did not give them money beyond the reimbursed check
9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22
Commission found no continuing financial transfers from Bayoumi to the two men.
Ambiguous
81U.S. State Department, 28 August 2006: public-diplomacy page on 'top' 9/11 conspiracy theories
U.S. Department of State — The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories (28 August 2006) · 2006-08-28
On 28 August 2006 the U.S. State Department published an official webpage rejecting the main 9/11 conspiracy-theory claims then in circulation.
Popular Mechanics 2005/2006: magazine investigation rejecting demolition, Pentagon-missile, and UA93 shoot-down claims
Popular Mechanics — 9/11: Debunking the Myths (March 2005) and Debunking 9/11 Myths (Hearst, 2006) · 2005-03-01
In 2005–2006 Popular Mechanics published a magazine investigation and a book arguing that the main demolition, missile, and shoot-down claims do not stand up to wreckage and engineering testimony.
Wikipedia, 9/11 conspiracy theories — article as finding aid (retrieved 3 Sep 2026)
Wikipedia — 9/11 conspiracy theories (encyclopedia article) · 2026-09-03
On 3 September 2026 the Wikipedia article listed the main 9/11 conspiracy-theory families and pointed at Commission, NIST, State Department, Eagar, and Popular Mechanics as external sources.
CIA IG August 2001: CTC practices reviewed positively — vs later OIG/Commission
The Central Intelligence Agency's 9/11 File (NSAEBB 381) · 2001-08-01
NSArchive records that a CIA Inspector General review completed in August 2001 praised CTC information-management and FBI cooperation, in contrast to the 2004 CIA OIG and the Commission.
Wikipedia sub-articles: WTC demolition theories, advance knowledge, 9/11 truth movement
Wikipedia — 9/11 conspiracy theories (encyclopedia article) · 2026-09-03
Wikipedia's demolition, advance-knowledge, and truth-movement pages repeat named sources already on this board; they did not add a new primary measurement.
September 11th Sourcebooks index (NSArchive volumes I–VII and updates)
National Security Archive — September 11th Sourcebooks · 2026-09-03
The National Security Archive organised a September 11th Sourcebook series of at least seven volumes plus later FOIA postings on Clarke, FAA, and NTSB transcripts.
Contemporary reports
76Commission / NORAD tapes: delayed notification and a phantom AA11
9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22
Military notification lagged FAA awareness; a phantom AA11 was injected into the response.
John Farmer: NORAD and some FAA accounts of 11 September were not true
John Farmer / 9/11 Commission staff statements on NORAD and FAA accounts · 2004-07-22
Commission senior counsel stated that NORAD's (and some FAA) accounts were not true.
CIA IG August 2001: CTC practices reviewed positively — vs later OIG/Commission
The Central Intelligence Agency's 9/11 File (NSAEBB 381) · 2001-08-01
NSArchive records that a CIA Inspector General review completed in August 2001 praised CTC information-management and FBI cooperation, in contrast to the 2004 CIA OIG and the Commission.
CIA SEIBs June–August 2001: Bin Ladin attacks 'imminent' / 'in the US'
The Central Intelligence Agency's 9/11 File (NSAEBB 381) · 2001-08-07
CIA senior briefs from June–August 2001 repeatedly warned of imminent Bin Ladin operations, including a 7 August SEIB titled 'Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in the US', and a 24 August note that an associated individual was considering U.S. operations without timing or targets.
CIA email 21 August 2001: 'Re: Khalid Al-Mihdhar'
The Central Intelligence Agency's 9/11 File (NSAEBB 381) · 2001-08-21
A CIA email dated 21 August 2001 is titled Re: Khalid Al-Mihdhar and is a Commission Chapter 8 citation.
CIA had Mihdhar visa information in January 2000; FBI notified August 2001
9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22
U.S. intelligence possessed Mihdhar's visa/travel data in January 2000 and did not get it to FBI watchlisting until August 2001.
Later recollections / analysis
87NORAD exercises on 11 September including Vigilant Guardian
Michael Bronner, '9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,' Vanity Fair (August 2006) · 2006-08-01
NORAD was running exercises on 11 September that included hijack-related injects, and operators asked whether reports were exercise or real.
Vanity Fair 2006: NORAD tapes vs earlier public NORAD timeline
Michael Bronner, '9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,' Vanity Fair (August 2006) · 2006-08-01
Published tape reconstruction shows NORAD's early public timeline was inconsistent with its own audio.
Kevin Ryan — Lies and Obstruction: Indefensible Air Defenses on 9/11 (8 Sep 2024)
International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2024-09-08
Ryan presented a 2024 talk arguing 9/11 air defences were 'indefensible' in a stronger sense than fog-of-war.
David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in official accounts of AA77 and UA93 (Toronto Report ch.7)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Griffin's 2012 chapter lists named process contradictions on AA77 notification and UA93 notification, plus Pentagon-object and UA93-shoot-down arguments with named witnesses and an FAA memo.
U.S. State Department, 28 August 2006: public-diplomacy page on 'top' 9/11 conspiracy theories
U.S. Department of State — The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories (28 August 2006) · 2006-08-28
On 28 August 2006 the U.S. State Department published an official webpage rejecting the main 9/11 conspiracy-theory claims then in circulation.
Popular Mechanics 2005/2006: magazine investigation rejecting demolition, Pentagon-missile, and UA93 shoot-down claims
Popular Mechanics — 9/11: Debunking the Myths (March 2005) and Debunking 9/11 Myths (Hearst, 2006) · 2005-03-01
In 2005–2006 Popular Mechanics published a magazine investigation and a book arguing that the main demolition, missile, and shoot-down claims do not stand up to wreckage and engineering testimony.
Official documents
80NORAD exercises on 11 September including Vigilant Guardian
Michael Bronner, '9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,' Vanity Fair (August 2006) · 2006-08-01
NORAD was running exercises on 11 September that included hijack-related injects, and operators asked whether reports were exercise or real.
Commission / NORAD tapes: delayed notification and a phantom AA11
9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22
Military notification lagged FAA awareness; a phantom AA11 was injected into the response.
U.S. State Department, 28 August 2006: public-diplomacy page on 'top' 9/11 conspiracy theories
U.S. Department of State — The Top September 11 Conspiracy Theories (28 August 2006) · 2006-08-28
On 28 August 2006 the U.S. State Department published an official webpage rejecting the main 9/11 conspiracy-theory claims then in circulation.
John Farmer: NORAD and some FAA accounts of 11 September were not true
John Farmer / 9/11 Commission staff statements on NORAD and FAA accounts · 2004-07-22
Commission senior counsel stated that NORAD's (and some FAA) accounts were not true.
CIA IG August 2001: CTC practices reviewed positively — vs later OIG/Commission
The Central Intelligence Agency's 9/11 File (NSAEBB 381) · 2001-08-01
NSArchive records that a CIA Inspector General review completed in August 2001 praised CTC information-management and FBI cooperation, in contrast to the 2004 CIA OIG and the Commission.
CIA SEIBs June–August 2001: Bin Ladin attacks 'imminent' / 'in the US'
The Central Intelligence Agency's 9/11 File (NSAEBB 381) · 2001-08-07
CIA senior briefs from June–August 2001 repeatedly warned of imminent Bin Ladin operations, including a 7 August SEIB titled 'Bin Ladin Determined to Strike in the US', and a 24 August note that an associated individual was considering U.S. operations without timing or targets.
Independent / media
56NORAD exercises on 11 September including Vigilant Guardian
Michael Bronner, '9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,' Vanity Fair (August 2006) · 2006-08-01
NORAD was running exercises on 11 September that included hijack-related injects, and operators asked whether reports were exercise or real.
Vanity Fair 2006: NORAD tapes vs earlier public NORAD timeline
Michael Bronner, '9/11 Live: The NORAD Tapes,' Vanity Fair (August 2006) · 2006-08-01
Published tape reconstruction shows NORAD's early public timeline was inconsistent with its own audio.
Kevin Ryan — Lies and Obstruction: Indefensible Air Defenses on 9/11 (8 Sep 2024)
International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2024-09-08
Ryan presented a 2024 talk arguing 9/11 air defences were 'indefensible' in a stronger sense than fog-of-war.
David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in official accounts of AA77 and UA93 (Toronto Report ch.7)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Griffin's 2012 chapter lists named process contradictions on AA77 notification and UA93 notification, plus Pentagon-object and UA93-shoot-down arguments with named witnesses and an FAA memo.
Popular Mechanics 2005/2006: magazine investigation rejecting demolition, Pentagon-missile, and UA93 shoot-down claims
Popular Mechanics — 9/11: Debunking the Myths (March 2005) and Debunking 9/11 Myths (Hearst, 2006) · 2005-03-01
In 2005–2006 Popular Mechanics published a magazine investigation and a book arguing that the main demolition, missile, and shoot-down claims do not stand up to wreckage and engineering testimony.
Wikipedia, 9/11 conspiracy theories — article as finding aid (retrieved 3 Sep 2026)
Wikipedia — 9/11 conspiracy theories (encyclopedia article) · 2026-09-03
On 3 September 2026 the Wikipedia article listed the main 9/11 conspiracy-theory families and pointed at Commission, NIST, State Department, Eagar, and Popular Mechanics as external sources.
Unresolved contradictions
- CTR-008WTC dust chips: thermite vs primer paint
- CTR-012Hijacker identities: BBC still-alive vs Commission mistaken-identity
- CTR-016NORAD first story vs NORAD tapes
- CTR-019IC911 journal vs IC911 journal on the Pentagon object
- CTR-021CIA IG August 2001 praise vs 2004 CIA OIG / Commission on CTC
- CTR-022NTSB public-docket refusal vs NSArchive FOIA release of the same path/ATC files