EVD-231
David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in official accounts of AA77 and UA93 (Toronto Report ch.7)
academic paperindependent researcherauthenticoriginal
Provenance
- Source
- The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001
- Date
- 2012-09-11
- Page
- Toronto Report, Chapter 7
- SHA-256
- 204f0d01ffa1c3781bce3cf7e04e1ce26fba9c72127911cdf86af3cbaf5fffa0
- Classification
- unclassified
- Copyright
- unknown
https://ic911.org/toronto-hearings/report/toronto-report-ch-07/
Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
Observation
Griffin's 2012 chapter lists named process contradictions on AA77 notification and UA93 notification, plus Pentagon-object and UA93-shoot-down arguments with named witnesses and an FAA memo.
Interpretation
Notification-timeline disputes support H011. That a 757 did not hit the Pentagon is H014 and is contradicted inside the same journal family (EVD-222/223). Shoot-down is H013.
Source text
Retrieved 2026-09-02. Mixes (a) documented process contradictions already in this lab (NORAD first story, Mineta, Hanjour skill-gap EVD-149, UA93 debris EVD-141) with (b) the conclusions that AA77 did not hit the Pentagon and that UA93 was shot down. Barbara Olson phone-call dispute and crater-appearance reports are stored as claims, not as NTSB path replacements.
Hypothesis linkage
FAA 22 May 2003 memo vs Commission 9:24 notification story.
Griffin ch.7 UA93 shoot-down strand (Nash, debris, phones).
Griffin ch.7 argues AA77 did not hit the Pentagon. In-cluster contradicts exist.
Citations
- Cites EVD-129