EVD-129
Mineta: Cheney asked if 'the orders still stand' as an aircraft approached
transcriptofficial governmentauthenticoriginal
Provenance
- Source
- Norman Mineta testimony, 9/11 Commission hearing, 23 May 2003
- Date
- 2003-05-23
- Page
- —
- SHA-256
- 9df1113e4e27f45b0496119d3547a6b2d16ea8682f72619852fd83c8a6adb9be
- Classification
- unclassified
- Copyright
- public domain
https://govinfo.library.unt.edu/911/archive/hearing2/9-11Commission_Hearing_2003-05-23.htm
Quality 3.63 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind3
Contemp3
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain4
Observation
Norman Mineta testified that Cheney confirmed standing orders while being updated on an inbound aircraft's decreasing range.
Interpretation
The words are on the hearing record. What the orders were is not specified in the quoted exchange. Do not fill that gap with a preferred plot.
Source text
OBSERVATION: The Transportation Secretary's sworn hearing testimony describes Vice President Cheney confirming standing orders as an aircraft closed on Washington. The Commission Report does not narrate this exchange. Shoot-down authority was discussed that morning; the timeline of when it was given is messy. INTERPRETATION A: the orders were a shoot-down order, and the aircraft (AA77 or UA93) was allowed through — a stand-down. INTERPRETATION B: the orders were standard PEOC continuity / intercept instructions, and Mineta's scene is about confirmation, not a secret stand-down. INTERPRETATION C: shoot-down of UA93 (H013) — but Mineta's scene is usually tied to the Pentagon inbound. The omission from the Report is a process fact (relevant to H009-class withholding of awkward testimony).
Hypothesis linkage
Mineta PEOC exchange largely unused in the final Report.
Mineta/Cheney orders — content of the orders unspecified.
Shoot-down orders were discussed that morning; link to UA93 not shown.