EFI·Evidence Fusion Initiative

Universal search

Search the sources

Keyword and entity retrieval over indexed evidence, hypotheses, and claims. Nothing is answered from model memory on this page. For a scored percentage with the working shown, open Fact or Fiction.

Score this

Topic remit

Day of

Engineering

Facilitation

Intelligence & process

Foreknowledge

Independent cluster

Entities

Matching claims

  • verifiedCLM-011

    American Airlines Flight 11 struck World Trade Center 1 at 08:46:40 on 11 September 2001.

  • verifiedCLM-012

    United Airlines Flight 175 struck World Trade Center 2 at 09:03:11.

  • disputedCLM-032

    NIST NCSTAR reports on the WTC are false as engineering explanations.

  • disputedCLM-036

    The Pentagon attack involved inside-the-building explosives before AA77's official impact.

Evidence supporting

26
EVD-111engineering report

FEMA Appendix C: sulfidized / eutectic-attacked steel samples

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

FEMA published photomicrographs of WTC steel with unusual sulfidation/eutectic thinning and said the sulfur source was unidentified.

Quality 3.38 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr2
Spec4
Comp2
Chain4
EVD-110engineering report

FEMA 2002: WTC 7 fire-induced progressive collapse; further study needed

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

An early official engineering team attributed WTC 7 to fire while flagging that the mechanism was not fully understood.

Quality 3.63 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain4
EVD-120government report

9/11 Commission did not investigate WTC 7's collapse mechanism

9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22

The 9/11 Commission did not produce a collapse-mechanism finding for WTC 7.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr4
Spec4
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-101government report

Commission: UA175 struck WTC2 at 09:03:11

9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22

A large aircraft identified as UA175 struck WTC 2 at 09:03:11, captured on live television.

Quality 4.38 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp5
Corr5
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-121academic paper

Harrit et al. 2009: active thermitic red/gray chips in WTC dust

Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan et al., The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2:7–31 (2009) · 2009-04-03

A 2009 peer-reviewed paper reports energetic red/gray chips in WTC dust that the authors identify as unreacted thermitic material.

Quality 2.75 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2
EVD-232academic paper

Kevin R. Ryan — Extreme temperatures at the WTC (Toronto Report ch.10)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Ryan compiles NIST temperature figures, molten-metal witness language, RJ Lee iron-sphere percentages, USGS molybdenum spheres, and FEMA Appendix C sulfidation, and treats them as requiring a heat source above office-fire steel-melting.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3

Evidence contradicting

5
EVD-117engineering report

ASCE Pentagon building performance: 757-class impact damage

ASCE/SEI Pentagon Building Performance Report (2003) · 2003-01-01

An engineering team mapped interior damage consistent with a large-aircraft mass trajectory through the Pentagon.

Quality 4.00 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth5
Ind4
Contemp3
Corr4
Spec4
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-125media report

Silverstein Properties later: 'pull it' meant withdraw firefighters

PBS — America Rebuilds: A Day with Larry Silverstein (2002) · 2005-01-01

Silverstein's office published a firefighter-withdrawal reading of 'pull it.'

Quality 2.13 / 5components retained
Prov2
Auth3
Ind3
Contemp0
Corr2
Spec3
Comp2
Chain2
EVD-122engineering report

NIST / critics: red/gray chips consistent with primer paint, not thermite

NIST WTC investigation FAQs (towers and WTC 7) · 2019-11-20

NIST and subsequent paint-chemistry arguments attribute the red chips to known coatings rather than explosives.

Quality 3.50 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr3
Spec3
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-324communication log

UA93 ACARS 09:23 and 09:28 mayday — NSAEBB 196 quotation

NTSB flight-path studies and ATC transcripts released via NSArchive (NSAEBB 196) · 2001-09-11

NTSB ACARS/ATC text quoted by NSArchive: UA93 received a 09:23 warning about cockpit intrusion and the NY impacts, then at 09:28 transmitted a mayday / 'hey get out of here' as it was hijacked.

Quality 4.13 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind3
Contemp4
Corr4
Spec5
Comp3
Chain4
EVD-116flight record

NTSB flight-path study: AA77 from Dulles to the Pentagon

NTSB flight-path studies, Air Traffic Control tapes, and CVR/FDR summaries (AA11, UA175, AA77, UA93) · 2002-02-19

NTSB reconstructed a continuous radar/path track of AA77 from takeoff to the Pentagon.

Quality 4.50 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind3
Contemp4
Corr5
Spec5
Comp4
Chain5

Ambiguous

34
EVD-119government report

Rapid recycling of WTC steel before a full forensic metallurgical programme

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

Most WTC structural steel was recycled before a full federal engineering investigation existed.

Quality 3.50 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr3
Spec3
Comp3
Chain4
EVD-106engineering report

NIST NCSTAR 1A: WTC 7 collapse initiated by fire-induced buckling of Column 79

NIST NCSTAR 1A — Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (2008) · 2008-11-20

NIST attributes WTC 7's collapse to fire-induced failure beginning at Column 79, with global collapse at 17:20.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-210academic paper

Kevin R. Ryan — Why the NIST World Trade Center Reports are False (Toronto Report ch.3)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Ryan cites NIST test and model figures (steel temperatures, sag, expansion, fire duration) and states they do not support the published collapse sequences; he notes NIST did not release its global models for independent runs.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-105engineering report

NIST NCSTAR 1: impact plus fire initiated collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2

NIST NCSTAR 1 — Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (2005) · 2005-09-01

NIST published a fire-and-impact initiation sequence for WTC 1 and WTC 2 in 2005.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-402scientific paper

Eagar & Musso 2001: WTC fires did not melt steel; floor-truss connections were the weak point

Thomas W. Eagar & Christopher Musso — Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation (JOM, Dec 2001) · 2001-12-01

In December 2001 MIT materials engineers published that WTC fires were not hot enough to melt steel and that weakened floor-truss connections were the likely weak point.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind4
Contemp4
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain3
EVD-307witness statement

911DA story: last Windows/observation-deck visit the night of 10 September

September 11 Digital Archive (RRCHNM / ASHP) · 2002-10-22

A October 2002 Digital Archive story claims a visitor party was on the WTC observation deck around 22:00 on 10 September 2001 and was offered rain checks dated 11 September.

Quality 2.50 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth2
Ind4
Contemp2
Corr2
Spec3
Comp2
Chain2

Contemporary reports

30
EVD-111engineering report

FEMA Appendix C: sulfidized / eutectic-attacked steel samples

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

FEMA published photomicrographs of WTC steel with unusual sulfidation/eutectic thinning and said the sulfur source was unidentified.

Quality 3.38 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr2
Spec4
Comp2
Chain4
EVD-110engineering report

FEMA 2002: WTC 7 fire-induced progressive collapse; further study needed

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

An early official engineering team attributed WTC 7 to fire while flagging that the mechanism was not fully understood.

Quality 3.63 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain4
EVD-119government report

Rapid recycling of WTC steel before a full forensic metallurgical programme

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

Most WTC structural steel was recycled before a full federal engineering investigation existed.

Quality 3.50 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr3
Spec3
Comp3
Chain4
EVD-120government report

9/11 Commission did not investigate WTC 7's collapse mechanism

9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22

The 9/11 Commission did not produce a collapse-mechanism finding for WTC 7.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr4
Spec4
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-402scientific paper

Eagar & Musso 2001: WTC fires did not melt steel; floor-truss connections were the weak point

Thomas W. Eagar & Christopher Musso — Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation (JOM, Dec 2001) · 2001-12-01

In December 2001 MIT materials engineers published that WTC fires were not hot enough to melt steel and that weakened floor-truss connections were the likely weak point.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind4
Contemp4
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain3
EVD-307witness statement

911DA story: last Windows/observation-deck visit the night of 10 September

September 11 Digital Archive (RRCHNM / ASHP) · 2002-10-22

A October 2002 Digital Archive story claims a visitor party was on the WTC observation deck around 22:00 on 10 September 2001 and was offered rain checks dated 11 September.

Quality 2.50 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth2
Ind4
Contemp2
Corr2
Spec3
Comp2
Chain2

Later recollections / analysis

35
EVD-106engineering report

NIST NCSTAR 1A: WTC 7 collapse initiated by fire-induced buckling of Column 79

NIST NCSTAR 1A — Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (2008) · 2008-11-20

NIST attributes WTC 7's collapse to fire-induced failure beginning at Column 79, with global collapse at 17:20.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-210academic paper

Kevin R. Ryan — Why the NIST World Trade Center Reports are False (Toronto Report ch.3)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Ryan cites NIST test and model figures (steel temperatures, sag, expansion, fire duration) and states they do not support the published collapse sequences; he notes NIST did not release its global models for independent runs.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-105engineering report

NIST NCSTAR 1: impact plus fire initiated collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2

NIST NCSTAR 1 — Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (2005) · 2005-09-01

NIST published a fire-and-impact initiation sequence for WTC 1 and WTC 2 in 2005.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-328transcript

Columbia 9/11 Oral History Project — holdings statement

Columbia Center for Oral History Research — September 11 Oral History Project · 2026-09-03

Columbia's 9/11 oral-history project reports five programmes, over 900 hours with over 600 people, 351 of them open, plus a 2011 book. Transcripts were not ingested.

Quality 3.25 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind4
Contemp3
Corr3
Spec3
Comp2
Chain3
EVD-200web archive

IC911 Data Archive — links inactive at ingest

International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2026-09-02

As of 2 September 2026 the IC911 data-archive page states that archive links are inactive and that a large archive of videos, photographs, and documents is being built.

Quality 1.00 / 5components retained
Prov2
Auth1
Ind3
Contemp0
Corr0
Spec1
Comp1
Chain0
EVD-121academic paper

Harrit et al. 2009: active thermitic red/gray chips in WTC dust

Harrit, Farrer, Jones, Ryan et al., The Open Chemical Physics Journal 2:7–31 (2009) · 2009-04-03

A 2009 peer-reviewed paper reports energetic red/gray chips in WTC dust that the authors identify as unreacted thermitic material.

Quality 2.75 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2

Official documents

24
EVD-111engineering report

FEMA Appendix C: sulfidized / eutectic-attacked steel samples

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

FEMA published photomicrographs of WTC steel with unusual sulfidation/eutectic thinning and said the sulfur source was unidentified.

Quality 3.38 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr2
Spec4
Comp2
Chain4
EVD-110engineering report

FEMA 2002: WTC 7 fire-induced progressive collapse; further study needed

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

An early official engineering team attributed WTC 7 to fire while flagging that the mechanism was not fully understood.

Quality 3.63 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr3
Spec4
Comp3
Chain4
EVD-119government report

Rapid recycling of WTC steel before a full forensic metallurgical programme

FEMA 403 — World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) · 2002-05-01

Most WTC structural steel was recycled before a full federal engineering investigation existed.

Quality 3.50 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr3
Spec3
Comp3
Chain4
EVD-106engineering report

NIST NCSTAR 1A: WTC 7 collapse initiated by fire-induced buckling of Column 79

NIST NCSTAR 1A — Final Report on the Collapse of World Trade Center Building 7 (2008) · 2008-11-20

NIST attributes WTC 7's collapse to fire-induced failure beginning at Column 79, with global collapse at 17:20.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-105engineering report

NIST NCSTAR 1: impact plus fire initiated collapse of WTC 1 and WTC 2

NIST NCSTAR 1 — Final Report on the Collapse of the World Trade Center Towers (2005) · 2005-09-01

NIST published a fire-and-impact initiation sequence for WTC 1 and WTC 2 in 2005.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp2
Corr4
Spec5
Comp4
Chain4
EVD-120government report

9/11 Commission did not investigate WTC 7's collapse mechanism

9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22

The 9/11 Commission did not produce a collapse-mechanism finding for WTC 7.

Quality 3.88 / 5components retained
Prov5
Auth5
Ind2
Contemp3
Corr4
Spec4
Comp4
Chain4

Independent / media

26
EVD-210academic paper

Kevin R. Ryan — Why the NIST World Trade Center Reports are False (Toronto Report ch.3)

The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11

Ryan cites NIST test and model figures (steel temperatures, sag, expansion, fire duration) and states they do not support the published collapse sequences; he notes NIST did not release its global models for independent runs.

Quality 3.13 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp1
Corr2
Spec4
Comp4
Chain3
EVD-200web archive

IC911 Data Archive — links inactive at ingest

International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2026-09-02

As of 2 September 2026 the IC911 data-archive page states that archive links are inactive and that a large archive of videos, photographs, and documents is being built.

Quality 1.00 / 5components retained
Prov2
Auth1
Ind3
Contemp0
Corr0
Spec1
Comp1
Chain0
EVD-207academic paper

Journal of 9/11 Studies — full article catalog (2006–2025)

Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2026-09-02

IC911 hosts a journal catalog of 70+ items. Several flight papers (Wyndham 2011, Legge & Stutt 2011, Salter 2006) argue against no-plane / no-Boeing theories.

Quality 2.50 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp0
Corr1
Spec3
Comp4
Chain2
EVD-401document

Wikipedia sub-articles: WTC demolition theories, advance knowledge, 9/11 truth movement

Wikipedia — 9/11 conspiracy theories (encyclopedia article) · 2026-09-03

Wikipedia's demolition, advance-knowledge, and truth-movement pages repeat named sources already on this board; they did not add a new primary measurement.

Quality 2.25 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth4
Ind3
Contemp0
Corr1
Spec3
Comp2
Chain2
EVD-214web archive

IC911 presentations catalogue (2023–2026)

International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2026-09-02

IC911 lists seven presentations 2023–2026 on flight simulation, seismic claims, hijacking, air defence, the North Tower spire, and WTC 7 free fall.

Quality 1.88 / 5components retained
Prov2
Auth3
Ind3
Contemp0
Corr1
Spec3
Comp2
Chain1
EVD-126video

BBC Jane Standley reports WTC 7 collapsed while it stands on camera

BBC World — Jane Standley live report of WTC 7 collapse (11 September 2001) · 2001-09-11

BBC World reported WTC 7 had collapsed at a time when the building was still standing on camera.

Quality 4.00 / 5components retained
Prov4
Auth5
Ind3
Contemp5
Corr4
Spec4
Comp3
Chain4

Unresolved contradictions

  • CTR-001Bayoumi's intelligence role: Commission 2004 vs FBI 2017
  • CTR-002Thumairy assistance: Commission vs FBI 2021
  • CTR-0031 February mosque visit: Bayoumi vs Bin Don
  • CTR-004Bayoumi first interview vs later account
  • CTR-005Chance meeting vs planned meeting
  • CTR-006FBI access representation vs later material
  • CTR-007WTC7 mechanism: NIST fire vs Hulsey not-fire
  • CTR-008WTC dust chips: thermite vs primer paint
  • CTR-009Silverstein 'pull it': demolition vs firefighter withdrawal
  • CTR-010Able Danger Atta identification
  • CTR-011Put options: unusual volume vs no plot-participant profits
  • CTR-012Hijacker identities: BBC still-alive vs Commission mistaken-identity
  • CTR-013Pentagon: AA77 vs no-Boeing
  • CTR-014UA93: passenger revolt vs shoot-down
  • CTR-015WTC7 free fall: NIST consistency vs demolition signature
  • CTR-016NORAD first story vs NORAD tapes
  • CTR-017WTC 7 Stage 1: NIST gradual vs Chandler instantaneous whole-roofline free fall
  • CTR-018Commission completeness vs Griffin omissions list
  • CTR-019IC911 journal vs IC911 journal on the Pentagon object
  • CTR-020CIA withholding: incompetence vs allowed-to-proceed
  • CTR-021CIA IG August 2001 praise vs 2004 CIA OIG / Commission on CTC
  • CTR-022NTSB public-docket refusal vs NSArchive FOIA release of the same path/ATC files

Developed by British researcher Moneypenny

@nic_moneypenny · Subscribe on X from $2 a month for other investigations, and to support this work.

Built with Grok by xAI. EFI / 911 is an independent research project. Neither Moneypenny nor xAI, X, or Grok accepts any liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Scores are not court or government findings. Privacy and terms.