Journal of 9/11 Studies — full article catalog (2006–2025)

Observation

IC911 hosts a journal catalog of 70+ items. Several flight papers (Wyndham 2011, Legge & Stutt 2011, Salter 2006) argue against no-plane / no-Boeing theories.

Interpretation

The journal is not a single claim. Counting papers as independent corroboration of demolition would ignore co-authorship and would ignore the flight papers that support official paths.

Source text

Journal of 9/11 Studies catalog ingested from https://ic911.org/journal/articles/ (retrieved 2026-09-02). Self-description: more than 70 peer-reviewed articles since 2006, reviewed by two field experts, in three categories.

WTC DESTRUCTION:
- David Chandler, The Descent and Tilting of the North Tower Antenna (Mar 2025)
- Søren Roest Korsgaard, A Preliminary Study of Flashes of Light Recorded During the Collapse of the South Tower (May 2024)
- Jonathan H. Cole, Discussion of Le & Bažant spontaneous collapse (Jul 2023)
- Chandler, Walter, Szamboti, Instantaneous Free Fall of WTC 7 and NIST's Attempt to Hide It (Jun 2023)
- Stevan D. Looney, Cause of WTC Destruction and Admissibility of Expert Testimony (Mar 2015)
- Eastman & Cole, WTC Destruction: Analysis of Peer-Reviewed Technical Literature (Apr 2013)
- André Rousseau, Were Explosives the Source of the Seismic Signals (Nov 2012)
- Ronald H. Brookman, Discussion of WTC 7 structural-response paper (Oct 2012)
- Anonymous / Frank Legge, Falsifiability and the NIST WTC Report (Mar 2010)
- David Chandler, Destruction of WTC North Tower and Fundamental Physics (Feb 2010)
- Harrit et al., Active thermitic material in WTC dust (Dec 2009; DE and ES translations)
- Graeme MacQueen, Did the Earth Shake Before the South Tower Hit the Ground? (Jul 2009)
- Frank Legge, Controlled Demolition at the WTC: Historical Examination (May 2009)
- MacQueen & Szamboti, The Missing Jolt (Apr 2009)
- Michael Fury, Ghost in the Machines: WTC hard-drive recoveries (Dec 2008)
- Kevin Ryan, Top Ten Connections Between NIST and Nano-Thermites (Jul 2008)
- Frank Legge, 9/11 and Probability Theory (Jun 2008); Proof of Explosive Demolition without Calculations (Mar 2008)
- Tony Szamboti, Sustainability of the Controlled Demolition Hypothesis (Feb 2008)
- Graeme MacQueen, Waiting for Seven: WTC 7 collapse warnings in FDNY oral histories (Jan 2008)
- Jones, Farrer, Jenkins, Legge, Gourley, Ryan, Farnsworth, Grabbe, Extremely high temperatures during WTC destruction (Dec 2007)
- Legge & Szamboti, Sudden Collapse Initiation Was Impossible (Dec 2007)
- Gregory H. Urich, Mass and Potential Energy of WTC 1 (Dec 2007)
- Gourley, McIlvaine, Doyle, Jones, Ryan, Gage, Appeal to NIST (Nov 2007) and Request for Correction (Jun 2007)
- Gregory S. Jenkins, Solving the Great Steel Caper / DEW contrary evidence (Oct 2007); Overwhelming Implausibility of Directed Energy Beams (Feb 2007)
- NIST (Catherine S. Fletcher), September 2007 Response to April 2007 Request for Correction
- Crockett Grabbe, Direct Evidence for Explosions: Flying Projectiles (Aug 2007)
- Jerry Lobdill, Physical chemistry of thermite/thermate as applied to WTC (Jun 2007)
- Kevin Ryan, High Velocity Bursts of Debris from Point-Like Sources (Jun 2007)
- Gordon Ross, NIST and Dr. Bažant — A Simultaneous Failure (May 2007)
- Steven E. Jones, Revisiting 9/11/2001 — Applying the Scientific Method (May 2007)
- Cate Jenkins, FBI/Senate requests on pH corrosivity data (May 2007)
- Jones v. Leslie Robertson (annotated by Gregg Roberts) (Apr 2007)
- Terry Morrone, Thermal/gravitational energy insufficient to melt steel (Apr 2007)
- Wes Lifferth, Molten aluminum poured onto rusty steel (Mar 2007)
- Robert Moore, Statement Regarding Thermite Part I (Jan 2007)
- Eric Douglas, NIST WTC Investigation — How Real Was The Simulation? (Dec 2006)
- Frank Legge, Acceleration Study Proves Explosive Demolition (Nov 2006); NIST Data Disproves Collapse Theories Based on Fire (Aug 2006)
- Steven E. Jones, Why Indeed Did the WTC Buildings Completely Collapse? (Sep 2006)
- Furlong & Ross, Seismic Proof (Sep 2006)
- Frank Greening letter and Gordon Ross reply (Aug 2006)
- Kevin Ryan, What is 9/11 Truth? (Aug 2006)
- Graeme MacQueen, 118 Witnesses: Firefighters' Testimony to Explosions (Aug 2006)

FLIGHTS:
- Aidan Monaghan, Implications of September 11 Flight Transponder Activity (May 2017); GPS-guided autopilot plausibility (Oct 2008)
- Paul Schreyer, Anomalies of the air defense on 9/11 (Oct 2012)
- John D. Wyndham, Pentagon Attack: Problems with Theories Alternative to Large Plane Impact (Nov 2011) [SUPPORTS large-plane impact]
- Frank Legge & Warren Stutt, Flight AA77 FDR Analysis Supports Official Flight Path (Jan 2011) [SUPPORTS official Pentagon path]
- Frank Legge, What Hit the Pentagon? Misinformation and Credibility (Feb 2010)
- Mark H. Gaffney, Electronics warfare plane over White House (Jul 2007)
- Eric Salter, Critical Review of WTC 'No Plane' Theories (Sep 2006) [CONTRADICTS no-plane]

OTHER (selected): Booth COVID-as-SDE (2025); Robinson & Ryan 9/11 and COVID as SDEs (Sep 2024); Robinson, Researching 9/11 and Beyond (Aug 2024); McGinnis Unanswered Questions excerpt (2023); Ganser Strategy of Tension (2014); Peter Dale Scott on Commission deception and Cheney (Feb 2007); David Ray Griffin, The American Empire and 9/11 (May 2007).

Cluster note: author overlap is dense. Harrit, Jones, Ryan, Gage, MacQueen, Legge, Szamboti, Chandler, Walter, Cole, Gourley recur. That is a research community, not ten independent laboratories.

Hypothesis linkage

• H004indeterminateseeded

  Journal catalog is mixed: demolition papers and anti-no-plane papers.