EFI/911

EFI·Evidence Fusion Initiative

Fact or Fiction

Fact or Fiction

Ask any question, including odd ones. You get a percentage, a clear call of more or less than 50%, the working, and the sources that produced it. If nothing matches, the score stays at 50% — nothing is invented.

Likelihood

ASCE/SEI Pentagon Building Performance Report (2003)

Less than 50%

46%

Equal to 50% — the sources do not tip either way

0% — fully contradicted50%100% — fully supported

The score is 46% — less than 50%. Contradicting sources currently outweigh supporting sources after quality and confidence are applied.

How 46% was calculated

Start at 50%. Move by half of the net source score after uncertainty. Net source score is -0.21 (from −1 contradict to +1 support). Uncertainty is 57%. So 50% + 50% × -0.21 × 43% remaining certainty = 46%.

Supporting sources

13

Weighted strength 2.50

Contradicting sources

9

Weighted strength 3.82

No stance yet

25

Pulls the score toward 50% · 8.08

Uncertainty

57%

Share of the file that is unlabelled or missing

Working

start at 50% + half of (net source score × remaining certainty)

0.5 + 0.5 × -0.21 × (1 − 0.57) = 0.455

This percentage is calculated from the sources listed below — it is a score, not a court finding. Official origin does not add extra weight. Independent origin does not subtract weight. Two papers from the same group are one cluster, not two independent confirmations.

Reasoning

  1. Step 1 · Match the question

    Closest stored question: H014 — The Pentagon was not struck by AA77 (missile or other object). Yes/no labels are taken from sources already linked to that question.

  2. Step 2 · Find matching sources

    40 source(s) matched the wording. 14 further source(s) already linked to the stored question were included even if they did not contain the search words. 5 matching claim(s) contributed inherited stances.

  3. Step 3 · Assign support or contradiction without inventing

    14 labelled from stored question links, 11 from claims, 0 labelled automatically (capped, marked, not saved as human review), 22 left with no stance.

  4. Step 4 · Weight each source

    Each source contributes strength = (quality / 5) × confidence × how strongly it agrees or disagrees. Support strength 2.5, contradict strength 3.82, no-stance strength 8.08. A zero on chain of custody still lowers the mean and stays visible.

  5. Step 5 · Turn that into a percentage

    Start at 50%. Move up if support outweighs contradiction, down if the reverse. Unlabelled sources shrink the movement, so a thin file stays near 50%. Working: 0.5 + 0.5 × -0.21 × (1 − 0.57) = 0.455.

  6. Step 6 · What this number is not

    This percentage is calculated from the sources listed below — it is a score, not a court finding. Official origin does not add extra weight. Independent origin does not subtract weight. Two papers from the same group are one cluster, not two independent confirmations.

What is still missing

  • 4 source(s) score zero on at least one quality check (shown on each card). Those zeros are kept visible and are not averaged away.
  • 5 source(s) are unverified, inactive, or recorded as not retrieved. A missing file is a gap, not a finding against the question.
  • 25 relevant source(s) have no stance yet. They increase uncertainty and pull the percentage toward 50%; they are not counted as support or contradiction.

Closest stored question

H014 · The Pentagon was not struck by AA77 (missile or other object)

day-of · match 5.2

Matching claims

  • disputedCLM-036

    The Pentagon attack involved inside-the-building explosives before AA77's official impact.

  • contradictedCLM-019

    The Pentagon was not struck by AA77.

  • well_supportedCLM-042

    About three-quarters of CIA materials cited by the 9/11 Commission, including all KSM interrogation reports, remained withheld as of the 2012 File posting.

  • disputedCLM-031

    The 9/11 Commission was not a truth-seeking body; the Report is a 'Zelikow Report' defined by systematic omissions.

  • disputedCLM-032

    NIST NCSTAR reports on the WTC are false as engineering explanations.

Sources that support this

13
EVD-148web archivesupports

CIT / no-Boeing-at-Pentagon claim

Citizen Investigation Team / Pentagon no-Boeing claims · 2009-01-01

A set of independent researchers published a no-Boeing account of the Pentagon event, citing selected witnesses and façade photos.

Quality 0.88 / 5components retained
Prov1
Auth1
Ind2
Contemp0
Corr0
Spec2
Comp1
Chain0

hypothesis link · zeros: contemporaneity, corroboration, chain_of_custody · human_seed link to H014 (seeded): CIT no-Boeing claim — low quality, still a cited object.

Quality zeros remain visible: contemporaneity, corroboration, chain_of_custody.

Sources that contradict this

9

Sources with no stance yet

25

Topics

Day-of events, engineering questions, process failures, and foreknowledge leads.

Developed by British researcher Moneypenny

@nic_moneypenny · Subscribe on X from $2 a month for other investigations, and to support this work.

Built with Grok by xAI. EFI / 911 is an independent research project. Neither Moneypenny nor xAI, X, or Grok accepts any liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Scores are not court or government findings. Privacy and terms.