EFI·Evidence Fusion Initiative

EVD-204

Piers Robinson — Manual or Automated? Flight simulation of reported 9/11 aircraft manoeuvres (May 2026)

academic paperindependent researcherunverifiedoriginal

Provenance

Source
Piers Robinson, Manual or Automated? Flight simulation study of reported 9/11 aircraft manoeuvres (May 2026)
Date
2026-05-01
Page
SHA-256
0a8f4f8200952297b9ff73c2957c8198b057a48833600acb2beb9e2f1141db38
Classification
unclassified
Copyright
unknown

https://ic911.org/reports/

Quality 2.63 / 5components retained
Prov3
Auth3
Ind4
Contemp0
Corr2
Spec4
Comp3
Chain2

Observation

IC911 published a May 2026 Robinson report whose title frames reported 9/11 manoeuvres as a manual-vs-automated question.

Interpretation

Until the report text is ingested, no finding about piloting skill or remote guidance follows from the title.

Source text

Catalogued from https://ic911.org/reports/ and https://ic911.org/ic911-presentations/ on 2026-09-02. Automated download of the PDF/PPTX failed (Cloudflare). The stated question is whether reported manoeuvres (including the Pentagon turn) were flyable by the named hijacker-pilots or required automation/remote guidance. That question is not answered in this row.

Hypothesis linkage

  • H014indeterminateseeded

    Flight-sim title does not decide whether AA77 hit the Pentagon; it asks how manoeuvres were flown.

People

Citations

  • No citation edges.

Developed by British researcher Moneypenny

@nic_moneypenny · Subscribe on X from $2 a month for other investigations, and to support this work.

Built with Grok by xAI. EFI / 911 is an independent research project. Neither Moneypenny nor xAI, X, or Grok accepts any liability for errors, omissions, or inaccuracies. Scores are not court or government findings. Privacy and terms.