Fact or Fiction
Fact or Fiction
Ask any question, including odd ones. You get a percentage, a clear call of more or less than 50%, the working, and the sources that produced it. If nothing matches, the score stays at 50% — nothing is invented.
Likelihood
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001
60%
More than 50% — weakly supported by the sources
The score is 60% — more than 50%. Supporting sources currently outweigh contradicting sources after quality and confidence are applied.
How 60% was calculated
Start at 50%. Move by half of the net source score after uncertainty. Net source score is 0.74 (from −1 contradict to +1 support). Uncertainty is 73%. So 50% + 50% × 0.74 × 27% remaining certainty = 60%.
Supporting sources
17
Weighted strength 3.58
Contradicting sources
2
Weighted strength 0.53
No stance yet
35
Pulls the score toward 50% · 10.87
Uncertainty
73%
Share of the file that is unlabelled or missing
Working
start at 50% + half of (net source score × remaining certainty)
0.5 + 0.5 × 0.74 × (1 − 0.73) = 0.600
This percentage is calculated from the sources listed below — it is a score, not a court finding. Official origin does not add extra weight. Independent origin does not subtract weight. Two papers from the same group are one cluster, not two independent confirmations.
Reasoning
Step 1 · Match the question
Closest stored question: H021 — The 9/11 Commission was structurally prevented from being a truth-seeking enquiry. Yes/no labels are taken from sources already linked to that question. Also close: H001, H011, H008.
Step 2 · Find matching sources
40 source(s) matched the wording. 7 further source(s) already linked to the stored question were included even if they did not contain the search words. 6 matching claim(s) contributed inherited stances.
Step 3 · Assign support or contradiction without inventing
7 labelled from stored question links, 15 from claims, 0 labelled automatically (capped, marked, not saved as human review), 32 left with no stance.
Step 4 · Weight each source
Each source contributes strength = (quality / 5) × confidence × how strongly it agrees or disagrees. Support strength 3.58, contradict strength 0.53, no-stance strength 10.87. A zero on chain of custody still lowers the mean and stays visible.
Step 5 · Turn that into a percentage
Start at 50%. Move up if support outweighs contradiction, down if the reverse. Unlabelled sources shrink the movement, so a thin file stays near 50%. Working: 0.5 + 0.5 × 0.74 × (1 − 0.73) = 0.600.
Step 6 · What this number is not
This percentage is calculated from the sources listed below — it is a score, not a court finding. Official origin does not add extra weight. Independent origin does not subtract weight. Two papers from the same group are one cluster, not two independent confirmations.
What is still missing
- 12 source(s) score zero on at least one quality check (shown on each card). Those zeros are kept visible and are not averaged away.
- 8 source(s) are unverified, inactive, or recorded as not retrieved. A missing file is a gap, not a finding against the question.
- 35 relevant source(s) have no stance yet. They increase uncertainty and pull the percentage toward 50%; they are not counted as support or contradiction.
- A second stored question (H001) also matches this wording. The percentage below is for H021 only — open the other question to compare. Do not average the two numbers.
Closest stored question
H021 · The 9/11 Commission was structurally prevented from being a truth-seeking enquiryprocess · match 12.8
Related questions
Same wording can map to more than one stored question. Each has its own percentage — do not average them.
Matching claims
- well_supportedCLM-042
About three-quarters of CIA materials cited by the 9/11 Commission, including all KSM interrogation reports, remained withheld as of the 2012 File posting.
- disputedCLM-031
The 9/11 Commission was not a truth-seeking body; the Report is a 'Zelikow Report' defined by systematic omissions.
- verifiedCLM-037
A large born-digital public archive of 11 September emails, stories, and images exists and was acquired by the Library of Congress in 2003.
- unverifiedCLM-034
Reported 9/11 aircraft manoeuvres were not flyable manually by the named hijacker-pilots (automation/remote guidance).
- verifiedCLM-011
American Airlines Flight 11 struck World Trade Center 1 at 08:46:40 on 11 September 2001.
- well_supportedCLM-009
The FBI withheld Bayoumi-related intelligence from the 9/11 Commission.
Sources that support this
172011 Toronto Hearings and 2012 Toronto Report — catalogue
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
A 2011 academic/legal hearing produced an 18-chapter 2012 report arguing the official account is false. Eleven chapters are objects in this lab; seven are title-catalogued.
hypothesis link · zeros: contemporaneity · human_seed link to H021 (seeded): The hearings exist as a competing enquiry product, not as proof the Commission failed.
Quality zeros remain visible: contemporaneity.
David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in the 9/11 Commission Report (Toronto Report ch.2)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Griffin's 2012 chapter lists Commission process constraints (Zelikow, funding, access) and twelve claimed omissions, with footnotes to named books, newspapers, and the Report itself.
hypothesis link · human_seed link to H021 (seeded): Griffin's process-and-omissions brief.
Peter Dale Scott — 9/11 as a deep event: CIA personnel helped allow it (Toronto Report ch.5)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Scott's 2012 chapter restates a documented CIA-to-FBI withholding pattern around Mihdhar and Hazmi (Malaysia 2000, visa, watchlisting) attributed to a small Alec Station group, and adds a Saudi-GID liaison hypothesis plus an 'allowed to proceed' inference.
hypothesis link · human_seed link to H021 (seeded): Fenton/Scott: post-9/11 investigations continued the withholding pattern.
Lorie Van Auken and Bob McIlvaine — Toronto Report ch.1 family testimony
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Two 9/11 family members testified in 2011 about their dead, the Jersey Girls' campaign for a full investigation, three NORAD public timelines, and Van Auken's contemporaneous unease at the Florida classroom footage.
hypothesis link · human_seed link to H021 (seeded): Family campaign documents demand for a fuller enquiry; not itself a Commission-failure finding.
CIA 9/11 File posting — 100+ FOIA documents, 19 June 2012
The Central Intelligence Agency's 9/11 File (NSAEBB 381) · 2012-06-19
In 2012 the National Security Archive posted 100+ CIA documents cited in Commission footnotes, and stated that this was about one-quarter of the CIA material the Commission cited, with KSM interrogation reports still withheld.
claim stance · Inherited from matching claim CLM-042.
Commission: AA11 struck WTC1 at 08:46:40
9/11 Commission Report · 2004-07-22
A large aircraft identified as AA11 struck WTC 1 at 08:46:40 on 11 September 2001.
claim stance · Inherited from matching claim CLM-011.
Ted Walter — The 9/11 Hijacking Myth Exposed (presentation, 8 Sep 2024)
International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2024-09-08
Walter presented a 2024 IC911 talk arguing hijacker piloting of the reported manoeuvres is implausible.
claim stance · zeros: contemporaneity · Inherited from matching claim CLM-034.
Quality zeros remain visible: contemporaneity.
Peter Dale Scott — 9/11 Commission deception, Cheney's actions, why he should testify under oath (Feb 2007)
Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2007-02-01
Scott published a 2007 process paper on Commission deception and Cheney's 9/11 actions, later expanded as Toronto ch.5.
hypothesis link · human_seed link to H021 (seeded): Scott 2007 Commission-deception / Cheney paper.
Sources that contradict this
2NTSB flight-path study: AA77 from Dulles to the Pentagon
NTSB flight-path studies, Air Traffic Control tapes, and CVR/FDR summaries (AA11, UA175, AA77, UA93) · 2002-02-19
NTSB reconstructed a continuous radar/path track of AA77 from takeoff to the Pentagon.
claim stance · Inherited from matching claim CLM-034.
Legge & Stutt — AA77 FDR analysis supports official Pentagon flight path (Jan 2011)
Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2011-01-01
A 2011 Journal of 9/11 Studies FDR analysis concludes the official AA77 path to Pentagon impact is supported.
claim stance · Inherited from matching claim CLM-034.
Sources with no stance yet
35Piers Robinson — Manual or Automated? Flight simulation of reported 9/11 aircraft manoeuvres (May 2026)
Piers Robinson, Manual or Automated? Flight simulation study of reported 9/11 aircraft manoeuvres (May 2026) · 2026-05-01
IC911 published a May 2026 Robinson report whose title frames reported 9/11 manoeuvres as a manual-vs-automated question.
claim stance · zeros: contemporaneity · Inherited from matching claim CLM-034.
Quality zeros remain visible: contemporaneity.
Robinson & Ryan — 9/11 and COVID-19 as structural deep events (Sep 2024)
Journal of 9/11 Studies · 2024-09-01
In 2024 IC911's journal published a paper treating 9/11 and COVID-19 as comparable structural deep events.
hypothesis link · human_seed link to H021 (seeded): COVID comparison is out of scope for 2001 mechanics.
IC911 who-we-are mission (research, preserve, public action)
International Center for 9/11 Justice · 2026-09-02
IC911 describes itself as preserving data, doing new research, and campaigning for a new investigation.
hypothesis link · zeros: contemporaneity · human_seed link to H021 (seeded): Mission statement.
Quality zeros remain visible: contemporaneity.
Paul Zarembka — Insider trading before 9/11 re-examined (Toronto Report ch.6)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
A 2012 hearing paper surveys three academic option-market studies and argues the combined pre-attack activity is not plausibly random, while treating UAL/AMR themselves as weak because of hedging.
unclassified · Retrieved as relevant; no inherited polarity. Unclassified mass raises uncertainty rather than inventing support or contradiction.
David Ray Griffin — Anomalies in official accounts of AA77 and UA93 (Toronto Report ch.7)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Griffin's 2012 chapter lists named process contradictions on AA77 notification and UA93 notification, plus Pentagon-object and UA93-shoot-down arguments with named witnesses and an FAA memo.
unclassified · Retrieved as relevant; no inherited polarity. Unclassified mass raises uncertainty rather than inventing support or contradiction.
Graeme MacQueen — 156 eyewitnesses describing explosions at the Twin Towers (Toronto Report ch.8)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
MacQueen compiled 156 accounts, mostly FDNY oral histories, in which speakers used explosion/bomb language about the towers; he documents both the original wording and some later retractions.
unclassified · Retrieved as relevant; no inherited polarity. Unclassified mass raises uncertainty rather than inventing support or contradiction.
David Chandler — WTC 7: A refutation of NIST's analysis (Toronto Report ch.9)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Chandler's 2012 hearing paper treats NIST's own Stage 2 free-fall interval as established and argues the 5.4 s overall figure is an artefact of start-time choice.
unclassified · Retrieved as relevant; no inherited polarity. Unclassified mass raises uncertainty rather than inventing support or contradiction.
Gage, Roberts, Dreger — Advanced pyrotechnic/explosive material in WTC dust (Toronto Report ch.12)
The 9/11 Toronto Report (2012), International Hearings on the Events of September 11, 2001 · 2012-09-11
Toronto ch.12 restates the 2009 Harrit red/gray-chip paper as forensic evidence against the official destruction account.
unclassified · Retrieved as relevant; no inherited polarity. Unclassified mass raises uncertainty rather than inventing support or contradiction.
Topics
Day-of events, engineering questions, process failures, and foreknowledge leads.